SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 492.01+1.3%12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mozek who wrote (7780)5/21/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: Flair   of 74651
 
mozek,

Your reasoning is correct, but DOJ will not take it
since MacOS and PowerPC are not that far-reaching platform.
DOJ and Microsoft's rivals tried to define Operating System
is non-evolving, e.g., fixed. This is why Microsoft says
this is "anti-innovative". There is nothing wrong with
"integration". I think DOJ knows that too. As a result,
DOJ current antitrust suit emphasizes in "illegal
anti-competitive business practice", instead of "integration".
It is hard for DOJ to prove that why "integration" is
bad for consumers and anti-competitive. If DOJ wants to
win the lawsuit, they needs to prove that Microsoft illegally
plotted to vanish Netscape, instead of
arguing on "integration" issue.

The Appeal Court is poised to rule in favor of Microsoft
in the consent-decree lawsuit, i.e., initial injunction on
Windows 95 is not proper. However, I think the Appeal
Court will not rule this until the release of Windows 98.
This will save Judge Jackson's face, since Windows 95 is
out-of-date.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext