SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (6904)2/15/2005 2:04:13 AM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
WAS A PAKISTANI BUSINESSMAN TRYING TO HELP AL-QAEDA GET A NUCLEAR WEAPON?

TKS
[02/14 11:31 AM]

Next time someone gets really concerned about what's being done to prisoners at Guantanimo Bay, remind them of this bit of news from Knight-Ridder:

<<<
A wealthy Pakistani businessman who's being held at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, prison camp for suspected terrorist ties urged al-Qaida operatives to acquire nuclear weapons for use against U.S. troops and said he knew where to get them, according to American investigators.

The allegation, contained in documents filed recently in U.S. District Court in Washington, also identifies Saifullah Paracha, 57, who has an import business in New York, as a participant in a plot to smuggle explosives into the United States and to help al-Qaida hide "large amounts of money."

There are few details about the smuggling plot and little additional information about what the businessman, a permanent U.S. resident who's been held 19 months without charges, may have known about how to obtain nuclear weapons.

Paracha, during a review tribunal of his case in November at the U.S. naval base in Cuba, vigorously denied any ties to al-Qaida and scoffed at the nuclear allegation.

"Is a nuclear weapon something I could buy off the shelf? Can you buy it from Tony Blair?" he told a panel of military officers, referring to the British prime minister...

Investigators charged that father and son met with top al-Qaida leaders in Pakistan, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, a mastermind of those attacks who was later captured.

Three months after his son's arrest, Paracha took a commercial flight from Pakistan to Thailand in July 2003 to meet with Kmart buyers. He was turned over to U.S. forces, who took him to Bagram air base in Afghanistan, where he was interrogated for more than a year, then shipped to Guantanamo last September.

The International Committee of the Red Cross told his wife, Farhat, that he was being held in Guantanamo as an enemy combatant, but the Defense Department refused to acknowledge it until his lawyer, Gaillard Hunt, filed a petition on Paracha's behalf in U.S. court.

Paracha is one of the most recent of 74 Guantanamo detainees who've filed petitions challenging their captivity. Two judges have issued opposing rulings on their rights, and a federal appeals court will decide whether judges can examine the merits of each case.

Hunt said Thursday that Paracha was "a businessman getting ready to meet Kmart buyers, the farthest thing from an enemy combatant."

The lawyer noted the difference in the way father and son are being treated: "They have held Saifullah for 17 months. Why didn't they indict him if they have evidence?"

In court papers, Hunt said any discussion of nuclear weapons by Paracha was general, "something many people have done over the past 60 years in our more anxious moments."

A Justice Department spokesman wouldn't discuss the Parachas' cases or why father and son are being treated differently. A spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in New York, Herbert Hadad, said prosecutors were ready to go to trial in the Uzair Paracha case.

The nuclear reference about Saifullah Paracha was one of 11 allegations from an unclassified summary of evidence that was used against him during a tribunal to review his status, a process that all 500-plus detainees in Guantanamo went through last year.

In a single passage, investigators told the tribunal that Paracha "recommended to an al Qaida operative that nuclear weapons should be used against U.S. troops and suggested where these weapons might be obtained."

Other allegations: Paracha met twice with Osama bin Laden and held "large amounts" of money for al-Qaida and discussed ways of getting chemicals and explosives into countries allied with the United States.

Paracha told the tribunal he met with bin Laden in 1999 to discuss a TV project on the Quran, and that the other meeting was with a business delegation that visited Afghanistan in 2000. He said his extensive business and charitable work might have brought him into contact with al-Qaida supporters.

"Sir, how could anybody know who al Qaida is?" he told the officers on the tribunal panel. "I believe in the Quran: that killing one innocent person is equal to killing all humanity."

Paracha's family has said he's pro-American. They released an e-mail from a business partner, Charles Anteby, who's Jewish: "We had friendly talks on religion ... he spoke very highly of America."
>>>

Just meeting to discuss an idea for a television show with bin Laden! Nothing to see here! You know bin Laden is big into television programming, that's why he keeps releasing these videos...

nationalreview.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext