Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG)

AENG 0.0001000

0.0%

Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RAY BARBER who wrote (779)	6/15/1998 3:35:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	of 3383

RAY: You state that: "If a company should put out the information in the public domain (web page) that is blatantly false, it could and would be construed as fraud." You seem sincere, so I will spell it out very clearly for you. I think they have committed fraud and I explain how and why below. Please go over the logic very carefully here because it appears that they have done exactly what you refer to in your post. Firstly, see AENG's website oxtwo.com under "what's new "it says "Issuance of United States Patent." You then click on "Notification of approval has been received for the patent of the OX2 Engine" Now read the letter from the Australian law firm on AENG's site: oxtwo.com Note that the letter is very unclear. It seems to be a letter notifying the inventor of the patent that his patent has been transferred to AENG Pty, which seems to be AENG's Australian subsidiary, but has not been disclosed by AENG, what if any ownership or relationship they have with AENG Pty. Thus you have an Australian law firm speaking on behalf of an Australian inventor about an Australian patent. From what I can tell, the letter has nothing to do with a US patent. IF the US patent law firm (mentioned in the letter) had posted something about an eminent patent being issued, it might mean a whole lot more. However, if you examine the excellent and might I say unbiased work by 246810, Sword and Wireless Wonk (which it seem there is more to follow) you would see that, if indeed AENG (US) were to receive a US patent, it seems that a) there are several close by patents that limit the broadness (is that a word?) the royalty stream available to AENG and b) The Big 3 could very likely trivialize said imaginary patent bye designing around it. See my post following Greg's feigned surprise at seeing what he thought was the US patent for further details: exchange2000.com All rights reserved, Auric Goldfinger.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next