SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Thomas M.6/9/2024 10:56:26 AM
3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Maple MAGA
Mevis
Neeka

   of 793928
 
Yale Law Professor Jed Rubenfeld explains how Alvin Bragg's prosecution violated Trump's Constitutional rights:

1. Selective prosecution
2. Defendant was not notified of the crime he was charged with
3. Jury was not unanimous on every part of the crime



The indictment was vague. That's obviously unconstitutional.
Where an indictment charges a crime that depends in turn on violation of another statute, the indictment must identify the underlying offense.

Similarly, when "one element of the offense is implicit in the statute, rather than explicit, and the indictment tracks the language of the statute and fails to allege the implicit element explicitly, the indictment fails to allege an offense."

In sum, for an indictment to fulfill the functions of notifying the defendant of the charges against him and of assuring that he is tried on the matters considered by the grand jury, the indictment must state some fact specific enough to describe a particular criminal act, rather than a type of crime.
SCOTUS U.S. v. Pirro casetext.com

Tom
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext