OUR UNDER .14 PICKS AS WINNERS AND WHY?? VSE ONLY Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : OUR UNDER .14 PICKS AS WINNERS AND WHY?? VSE ONLY

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rise who wrote (78)	1/11/2000 8:37:00 AM
From: The Osprey	of 98

Not sure rise but CQ did settle their flagship property(the copper mineralized property) via the supreme court.They are now pursuing financing to bring it to the pre-feasibility phase I was told.They are also exploring other venues but are not interested in .com type deals. BM has a Pres who has put 1.23 MM of his own money in the company over the last three years and they are actively pursuing a project through UBC as one of the directors is a prof their.They have looked a a number of dot com's I am told but they say they are not interested in that type of venue as that is being worked to death with web domain registration and web page construction and half to 3/4 of them have nothing of value.I am told the debt showing is the Pres's and he wants to do a shares for debt but not all of it.Pres agrees financing in the mineral field is hard to come by so alternatives will be sought.I have bought this as a longer term hold unless it spikes quick. The Osprey

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next