Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kodiak_bull who wrote (79069)	11/15/2000 12:36:01 PM
From: isopatch	of 95453

OT/Agree K.B. We need to do a whole lot better than we have: And it's damn difficult with the economic and political interests who so frequently obscure objective science as well as practical approaches to assessing and dealing with these must solve problems in a more timely and practical way. On the government side of the fence, for example, the EPA's arbitrary and near perfect parts/million standards that they demand before certifying completion of each "super fund" toxic waste site has resulted only a handful of sites being worked towards ice cream plant purity. Meanwhile risks of greater and greater environmental damage rise at the huge number of very dangerous super fund sites that this EPA regime may never get to! It's time for some common sense standards to enter into dealing with these problems so we can get the job done! Huge amounts of money have been spend in what IMO has been a horribly administered program and only questionable outcomes to show for it. Isopatch

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next