SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JPR who wrote (7921)10/7/1999 4:46:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit   of 12475
 
Whether or not 292 is "plenty" remains to be seen; however, it should be obvious that 24 (the number of parties sharing power) is more than plenty!<g>

Of your suggestions, #1 is already there in the form of the Anti-defection Act. And #2 makes no sense because a no-confidence vote is just that -- a vote of no confidence. Nothing more. Besides, why should it be the PM alone? Why not his/her Cabinet? Also, #5 is silly, because such an experiment can easily lead to dictatorship of the Indira Gandhi sort. If it works in the USA, it is because of a whole bunch of other reasons.

#3, 4 and 6 are all aimed at Sonia Gandhi and deserve no further comment. Apparently, your BJP has no compunctions about sleeping with the likes of Sukh Ram and Chauthala. Otherwise, you might have added that candidates with criminal records ought to be barred. Nor do you have any suggestions that enable people passing no-confidence motions of their own by recalling their representatives. All you want is stability, as if stability by itself would ensure progress.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News