A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: TimF	8/4/2009 1:01:38 PM
	of 42652

Markets, Not Mandates How medical markets would improve health care and reduce costs Ronald Bailey \| July 28, 2009 reason.com Only the Libertarian Fringe Offers Real Health Care Reform Arnold Kling Ronald Bailey writes, "The health care "reform" currently being hammered out by the Democratic leadership of the House of Representatives already clocks in at $1 trillion and 1,000 pages--and it's nowhere near done. But one thing is clear: the legislation attempts to substitute top-down mandates from a centralized bureaucracy for the distributed decisions made by millions of consumers, physicians, and insurers acting in a marketplace. This will fail." The basic problem that the Democrats have with health care reform is that when it comes to taking our system away from free markets, there is just not that much farther we can go. We already regulate the practice of medicine and allied health services with licensing cartels. We already regulate individual health insurance practically out of existence, particularly in states that require "community rating" and "must-carry," which force insurance companies to charge the same price to all comers, which means that the only price they can safely charge is the price that assumes you are only asking for insurance because you just came down with a really expensive illness. We already have government insuring the poor and the elderly. In contrast, there is a lot of room to move health care in the other direction--toward free markets. The only real health care reformers are those of us on the libertarian fringe. The two major parties are just posturing. That's why I haven't written much about the day-to-day debate on "reform." It is not clear to me that defeating the Democrats' legislation is something I should root for. We're still nowhere near considering real reform. econlog.econlib.org

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next