SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (81235)3/11/2003 2:41:18 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
Have given that a good deal of thought, John. Of course, people in the US have the right to present their views on a subject, as long as it isn't treasonous. The sign I mentioned seeing the other day says it again:

Home of the Free
Because of the Brave
Support Our Soldiers

I harken that back to ALL the soldiers who have protected this country and the rights of Freedom we have.

BUT, truly am trying to understand WHY people don't think they/WE have enough evidence to think Saddam is a credible and immediate threat....??

Our Administration says he is a credible threat.

Is that it? Does the left (and some of the far right) just not believe them?

Do they think that we don't have satellite pictures, and evidence from MANY defectors? And "Saddam's Bombmaker"....etc

Or as I said before, do we have to get bombed again for actual physical proof to appear?

If not, which seems to you to be legitimate opposition and which seems to be in support? Is it possible, in short, in your mind for folk to oppose Bush and not support Saddam?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News