SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Wind River going up, up, up!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JMD who wrote (8149)7/30/2000 3:07:16 PM
From: Don Lloyd   of 10309
 
Mike -

[...I have absolutely no idea why a Qualcomm customer or Qualcomm itself will be liberated to cross-license GSM IPR holders as a result of this Spinco action. Can you explain it to me?...]

It would be SPINCO that is free to cross license to enable it to build parts including GSM.

For a new customer that has GSM IPR and needs CDMA rights, it previously might have needed 10 items from QCOM for $10 in royalties. If it felt QCOM needed GSM IPR, it might have tried to bargain the net cost down to $5 and GSM rights.

After QCOM spins off SPINCO, and gives it 2 of the 10 CDMA items that the new customer needs, the new customer will still need to pay the full $10 to QCOM for the remaining 8 CDMA items, and will have to enter a royalty-free cross license agreement with SPINCO for the remaining 2 in exchange for the GSM that SPINCO needs, but that QCOM doesn't (because it no longer manufactures anything in this area).

Regards, Don
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext