SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : INFORMATION ANALYSIS (IAIC) - YEAR 2000 Date Remediation
IAIC 4.280+12.3%Dec 16 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Matthew F. Kern who wrote (819)9/8/1997 2:51:00 PM
From: ThirdEye   of 2011
 
hedgy1:

Since most of the time I barely have time to answer my mail, I haven't reread all your earlier posts before making a few comments here. Forgive me if I dropped some details. So my issues are these:

1. The timing: you last graced this board in the first week of August, just at a time when there was heightened speculation about NAZ listing. Your articulate and forceful denunciation of IAI glibly warned of trading being halted, among other things, suggesting that the SEC was probably investigating. Now you show up again, first week of Sept.(just a coincidence, I'm sure) just before actual listing, and essentially suggest that the investigative arm of Nasdaq is practically salivating at the thought of being able to pounce on IAI as soon as it gets a chance-and again suggest that trading may be halted. So which is it? With all of the resources at your disposal and your deep knowledge of the investigative practices of the Nasdaq and SEC, how come you weren't right the first time? Why should I believe you now?

2. Since you seem to know the company so well, maybe you could tell us if IAI is getting any calls from entities wanting to be a beta site for the ADS/O tool. How many calls would that be-per day? None? More than ten? If it's closer to the latter, would that mean you either don't really know the size of the ADS/O market, or that you have been deliberately misleading?

3. (Aside)TO ALL: engaging in a pissing contest with ALYD(or any other co.) is a BS waste of everyone's time. Cut it out.

4. Hedgy, you asserted that Kevin Coyne was eased out of CA with a little help, if I remember correctly. Your characterization would imply inside information coming directly from either Coyne's superiors, or at least his peers, if not others not so directly in contact with what exactly happened, or maybe even someone with their own axe to grind? Say it isn't so. If IAI is a scam, then Coyne would have to be playing along. Care to tell us the nature of Coyne's compensation package? Like, did he get a chunk or preferred stock?

5. Yes, how much Y2K business CA gets, and the status of their tool suite does matter to us. CA is a bit like the phone company, no? When your line needs fixing, you'd love to call somebody else because the phone company is a pain in the ass and they charge more. But when everybody's line needs fixing-and by a certain date- they can't ALL get service from the smaller guys because they just don't have the capacity, and their price is going to rise as time passes anyway. So you grit your teeth and write the check.

6. One last item: Are you a full-time paid analyst? Do you work for H.C Wainwright in Boston? Does Wainwright have a short position in IAIC? How(or whether) you answer this is kinda important, wouldn't you say? You can tell the truth, you can lie, or not answer at all. Not answering at all might cast your comments in a different light. Lying might work, but if you do work for Wainwright and it was ever determined that you did lie in this forum, the NASDAQ might be interested. Telling the truth? Well...we'll have to see, I guess.

RSVP?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext