SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Taro who wrote (822773)12/18/2014 4:58:55 AM
From: Taro1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) of 1576125
 
You still haven't come up with a mechanism, why so far, during the previous (not man made...) global warming periods on record, the CO2 peak always tracked the heating peak significantly - by aro 800 years actually - and not the other way around.



An important one is that not all global warming periods show the same effect. The ones you are talking about were when the ice ages warmed. Not all global warming events were like that.



All the global warming periods on record show that same effect: The CO2 peak does track the heating peak and not the other way around.

As for the ones not on record, the ones you seem to know a lot about, which according to your unusual level of knowledge seem to behave the other way around, please share some of that unique intelligence with us all, will you?


Links of any kind certainly would be helpful :)

/Taro
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News