Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Charles R who wrote (82749)	12/13/1999 2:09:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) of 1572121

Chuckles - Re: "If moving people to new instruction sets were so easy why didn't MIPS, Alpha, Intel's own 860 succeed? " Answer - Intel's Pentium and Pentium Follow on chips. Re: " The fraction of applications that get ported to IA-64 will probably be less than 10% of x86 applications 5 years out." Let's see - how many x86 applications are there - 75,000 or 200,000 ? Actually, it doesn't much matter. ITanium is not meant to be a WINDOWS CPU. I don't think its the sheer volume - its's the ENTERPRISE NATURE of applications. Big Software for Big Silicon (ITanium). That's the ticket. IA64 CPUs will be the heart of ENTERPRISE SERVERS in just a few short years - and most of these are currently UNIX based. Since UNIX already RUNS on ITanium - Monterey, Linux, Solaris 64 - Intel's presence in the ENTERPRISE SERVER segment will have a HIGH PROBABILITY of going from near zero% to >50% in 3 or 4 years. Paul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next