The "safety net" conception of welfare is quite consistent with conservative politics. It is not far different than the idea of the socialization of risk through the establishment of fire- departments and police agencies, or for that matter ordinary insurance, except that one has an automatic buy in as a citizen. It says that although we rely upon private arrangements and individual responsibility for most things, we are a community in times of emergency, and we will not abandon the helpless or forsake those truly down on their luck. On the other hand, society is primarily shaped to instill responsibility and encourage achievement, not facilitate mindless consumption. We take care of the weak, but do not breed weakness.
Friedman's idea of simplifying maintenance works for those who are likely to need cash for prolonged periods, but may not be so wise for those who need encouragement and training to get off of the dole. It may be, for example, that we want to create group houses for unwed mothers, to ensure high- school completion, adequate child care, and the opportunity for part- time work. Anyway, we may want to think through the demands and incentives a little more... |
