SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: American Spirit who wrote (8370)6/3/2004 1:08:18 AM
From: DavesM  Read Replies (2) of 90947
 
Once again, you are wrong. The truth is, California has a progressive income tax structure. The reason that California has a huge deficit, is rich people in California suffered losses, and therefore had lower tax obligations - than before the 2000 market crash. California saw decreases of roughly $10 billion in revenue - from decreased taxes based on capital gains. This in large part is due to the collapse in gains from exercising stock options and capital gains from stock sales (and a $10 billion increase in State spending). - At least according to State of California in September 2002 (when Gray Davis was Governor).

lao.ca.gov

re:"Arnold should have listened to Bufffet then California wouldn't be hock now for 15 billion. Instead, we could gradually balance our budget by making people like Arnold himself pay a little more property taxes. Arnold's way, the middleclass pay for most everything."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext