SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semtech
SMTC 79.61+1.7%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John F. Poteraske who wrote (856)2/13/1998 11:49:00 PM
From: Todd D. Wiener  Read Replies (1) of 886
 
Would you believe SMTC was up 18% this week? I'm loving it! I'm sure glad I loaded up below $18. There was a lot of resistance at $28-29 that SMTC seems to have broken thru. It remains to be seen what happens next week. SMTC would have to reach the low 40s to have the same valuation it had at its October peak. If the stock continues upward in anticipation of good earnings on Wednesday, the stock may sell-off on the news, unless it's really good. I figure that since my estimates are higher than the "Street's" consensus, the stock will rally to its old highs if I am pleasantly surprised by the company's outlook. The next resistance level is around $32, and that's a pretty weak area, so it's perfectly reasonable that SMTC could rise 20% next week to its highs, before pulling back to $29 or so.

We'll have to see what happens. If anyone cares, LUFK is probably going to release earnings on Tuesday. Hopefully it will announce a stock split and a dividend hike. Although I expect the company to beat estimates, the market cares about 1998, not Q4 1997. I think that the oil situation is temporary, and it should improve as the year goes on. LUFK is certainly one of the best investments in the oilfield sector, due largely to its very low valuation. Once the market starts to like oil stocks again, LUFK should begin to pick up steam.

Todd
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext