Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (85850)	11/12/2004 8:10:23 PM
From: Lane3	of 793912

It was 99% a victory for the pro-choice side. As it turned out, but the original concept was pretty good. The trimester scheme allowed restrictions in both the second and third trimesters. That seems reasonable to me. I appreciate your point about abuse of the mental health provision. I don't know a good way around it, though. As a practical matter, the converse would likely have the same problem. If you criminalized abortion, you probably wouldn't get a lot of convictions. It would be hard to find twelve people who would convict unless the woman did something really outrageous like aborting a viable fetus because it was the wrong sex.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next