SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (85850)1/7/2000 4:55:00 PM
From: tejek   of 1574200
 
How nice it must be to define someone else's words to meet your agenda. "Failed to meet their commitments" is the usual term to describe a failure to meet their commitments. We all know Gateway wanted more than Intel could deliver. That's not news. Intel has publicly stated they would meet their commitments and Gateway has not disputed that claim.

EP,that's okay....you keep checking press releases for those words but I have better things to do with my time.

I have said this before, Intel in 1999 is not unlike Rome at the time of Nero; even empire's can fall when there is no one taking care of business.

ted

BTW what I think is the real truth about this whole fiasco....Intel promised Dell and GTW the works...all the chips they needed at good prices in order to keep business from AMD ...and it backfired on them as these sort of business schemes often do.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext