SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Floorless Preferred Stock/Debenture

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mark Ivan who wrote (865)8/24/1999 8:32:00 AM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (2) of 1438
 
The calculus may be different.

If they short a number of shares from $2 to $0.2 down in a linear way (just an assumption, a geometric decline is more suitable) and return their loan money of $400k, but have conversion/registration rights for, say 2MM shares at 0.02 (the $400K) - the then applicable conversion price with how many shares do they end:

Shares shorted = $400K * (1/2) * ($2 - $0.2) ~ 444K shares.
So they would end up with 1.56MM shares AFTER covering their short positions.

If the price decline is more geometric (or linear in shorted volume * price) then they would perhaps short more shares in total for $400k but in no case all the shares (or $$$ amount) at the conversion price, 0.2. Again leaving over a number of shares outright with a zero base.

Got it?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext