Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Who, me? who wrote (8735)	10/10/1998 11:31:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	of 67261

Me calling you mean is blasphemous? Is this an extension of the Tom DeLay definition that saying anything bad about Ken Starr is obstruction of justice? You have the right to pick and choose among your Biblical verses as you see fit. Your Christianity doesn't seem to have much to do with the Christ I've read about, but that's life. Given the ample evidence you've presented here, I believe it's reasonable to call you mean. And I don't think that constitutes blasphemy. Anyway, it's a bit confusing who started attacking who first. Am I confused? Did Clinton start some big underground war against Richard Mellon Scaife that I haven't heard about? I'm always interested in learning new "facts" and "substance", as opposed to the endless regurgitation of rumors, innuendo, and charges that have been investigated forever without anything concrete being established. Oh, I know, Ken Starr's got this secret hoard of evidence that actually has some substance to it, we'll hear about it all momentarily.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next