If current russian logics are applied to this xinjiang china situation, whoever borders this province, with links to the Uighur separatist movement by ancestory, than they could make the claim that an invasion of this province is wholly justified.....to prevent ethnic cleansing by Han peoples.
i have no knowledge of this china area or the rivalries throughout history..which are manifesting todays dissent..so this isnt an opinion pro or con
using russia logics; an invasion by XYZ could be called for.
in the georgia conflict output from medvedev putin and lavorov are to be triangulated, to get a clear view of the working dialectics being applied. There is major evidence of contradictions in the threes singular rationalizations......bottom line; is that the whole thing appears to be a contrivance, fomented to secure strategic goals that can be further extrapolated into future tactical initiatives.
the situation should be rolled back by a consortium of interests made up of ground forces of europe & the new republics, with backing from Nato air and Naval power.
stop subversion in its tracks or fight another hundred year battle that serves only central hegemonies goals....and we should all be able to see, at this point, what that means.
russia has an identity crisis.....the sum of its former parts, need to let russia know, there can be no misunderstanding, that those parts, are no longer the perceived property of the former.
Russia needs to adapt to a world where russia is an identity to be respected, not for its gun toting behaviors, but because its citizens interject character and meaning into the broader social fabric.
russias state goals are disconnected from its own citizens....its current projected aims, are not in service of its own people, or in the best interest of any of those who now find themselves staring down an all too familiar gun. |
