Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (88489)	11/28/2004 6:53:26 AM
From: Sig	Read Replies (2) of 793928

Why Bush Won A look at the numbers, what they really mean and what happens next .>>>> I am in sync with the words of David Gergen and his ability to think clearly and with freedom from political bias. He is 'right on' in presenting the many reasons for Kerrys loss. If the Democrats presented a program and candidate that could be recognized as providing better government IMO, I could or would vote for him. The lead horses they promote, must be trusted to provide a noticeably better ride than the present ones in office. If the economy had continued to fail under Bush( credit goes to Greenspan and the Fed). If we had lost in Afghanistan. If we had gotten bogged down in Iraq. If major attacks on US had continued. If Dan Rather had not been so swiftly found out as a liar. If Clinton (peace at any price) had not been asked to speak for Kerry when military action against terrorists was regarded as a necessity. If Hillary had not been so supportive in voting for Bushes programs ( the lady is brilliant, knowing she will need support from both sides to win future elections) If Kerry and company had not tried continually to trash Bushes service record when it has been under scrutiny by the best trashers for over twelve years since he became Texas governor. Thats like looking for WMD's where there aren't any. (g) Any of these events would have enhanced the Democrats chances . The US is still the deciding empire in world affairs. We expect consistent and clear performance from the leaders, who will never be perfect nor meet all our demands. Life of a Nation is a learning process, which entails both success and failure Adaptability and change being more important than long term goals such as balancing a budget or providing enhanced benefits for homosexual marriage. Or in maintaining a nicey-nicey relationship with countries like France. What is it with those people, that they are having problems with Muslim immigrants? Will they once again drift along and refuse to face and correct problems until the US is once more asked to step in and save their asses. Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh. Demands by the public for intimate details of properly secret operations such as in the CIA or FBI, or in the publcation of misinformation that sometimes must be fed to an enemy, are out-of-line and harmful. If Saddam had known we had invisble (to radar) F-117's in 1991 he could have developed more a effective response. What will 2005 bring to the fore? More surprises I expect. And more front page distortions by the MSM who are far too concerned with politics and in telling us how to think. When did they last summarize and present the good side , such as the progress of democracy in Afghanistan, of the cooperation we are getting from other countries in hunting down terrorists. Has the MSM informed us about progress on a marvelous replacement for the World Trade Center and what it will symbolize.? I dont think so. Sig

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next