Toy,
You obviously have some serious frustration (maybe because you can't be a real soldier?)
"Unlike you , I work directly with the customer base that you sell your products to."
You don't know if I work with customers at all.
Since you actually work for MSFT, ANSWER THE QUESTIONS instead of going on the defensive."
Sorry to disappoint you Toy, but there is not one question mark in your message. If there were, I would decide whether I felt like answering or not. Usually, I will respond to a real request for information with information. Your approach tends to be fruitless, but you haven't noticed that your not learning much, have you?
"...amazing that you and the other pro-MSFTers cannot answer how MSFT is going to convince the corporate customer to to purchase NT5..."
Regarding NT 5, I have never argued with you about that or told you anything of my knowledge of Microsoft's corporate marketing strategy for NT 5. You can say I'm in denial or anything you like. It won't change the fact that I will discuss issues as I see fit.
Our company is large enough that we know where MSFT is going in their development over the next couple years. We have already been told about NT5.1."
I don't care what company you work for. Unless you are engaging in corporate espionage, you do not know our development plans for the next two years. Keep deluding yourself.
"And, in typical MSFT mentality, you will generally catagorize MSFT negative OBJECTIVE news and opinions as drivel."
I have not, to my knowledge, ever categorized objective information as drivel, regardless of your ability to capitalize letters. I only categorize contentless, lengthy wastes of time such as your posts drivel.
"For the rest of you, please take note how my points have yet to be responded to with counter-points. So guess who is right."
I don't know what you mean Toy. I didn't notice one "point" in your post.
BTW, I'm pretty busy and will most likely ignore the rest of your drivel.
Bye
|
