>> Right...seems like that point is lost on Carson (and knucklehead inode).
This is political correctness and nothing more.
Even the so-called "researchers" won't admit their findings. Take this guy:
Hensley recently authored a study that he said is one of the first to examine a shift in sexual orientation in prisons. He and his co-author questioned 142 prisoners at a maximum-security facility in the South about their sexual orientation. They found that of the sample, 24 men changed sexual orientation while incarcerated.
Of those 24, 18 changed from straight to bisexual, three changed from bisexual to straight, and one each changed from bisexual to gay, gay to bisexual, and gay to straight.
These results do not conclusively support Carson’s point, Hensley said. The sample size is too small to make any sweeping conclusions -- 142 is just about 0.001 percent of the nation’s prison population.
Okay, I agree -- the sample size is small. So, why even do the study? Why bother, if your findings, which are statistically significant, if you can't be honest about the conclusions. It is true you can't infer causation on prison, but neither is it necessary to discredit your own study when you have statistically significant results.
We've seen the same nonsense with Global Warming -- where findings don't support Warmism. So, they either change the findings altogether via manipulation or try to explain it away in some other way.
I'm tired of lies. |
