SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (894736)10/18/2015 1:40:59 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) of 1574061
 
The Real Cost Of Wind Power
October 18, 2015

By Paul Homewood



https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/10/09/is-wind-power-really-cheaper/

We saw the headlines last week of claims that wind power is now the cheapest source of electricity. As I pointed out at the time, such claims ignore the fact that wind needs back up capacity, and therefore cannot be directly compared with conventional, dispatchable capacity.

I have now had a chance to do some detailed costing, based on the EIA calculations that they published in June.



http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/electricity_generation.cfm

My costings are derived from this table:



First, let’s convert these unit costs back to annual costs per MW capacity.

So using Advanced CCGT for instance, the capital cost of $15.9/MWh equals an annual cost of $121177. (EIA assume 30 yrs life span for all technologies, so we can project this to a total capital cost of $3.292 million per MW).

The calculation is :-

$15.9 x 8760 (hours/yr) x 87% (capacity factor)

We can do a similar calculation with fixed costs. Before variable costs, therefore, we get the following annual cost per MW in $.

Adv CCGTOffshore WindOnshore Wind
Capital121177561236181962
Fixed152427489840366
Total136419636134222328


Capacity Factors

Although the EIA have set assumptions for capacity utilisation, they don’t necessarily apply to the UK. For instance, according to DECC, onshore wind only produces 26% of its theoretical capacity.

Also, because of large variations in overall demand, conventional power does not always run at anywhere near its technical capability.

DECC data suggest that CCGT was operating at around 58% of capacity back in 2010, before subsidised renewables began to seriously distort the grid.

Using this figure, we can build up a cost for gas only, based on 1MW of capacity:

Advanced CCGT$
1 MW @58%= 5080 MWh/yr
Capital+Fixed Costs/yr136419
Capital+Fixed Costs/MWh26.85
Variable Costs/MWh53.60
Total Cost /MWh80.45


Similarly for wind:

Onshore Wind$
1 MW @26% = 2277 MWh/yr
Capital+Fixed Costs/yr222328
Capital+Fixed Costs/MWh97.64
Variable Costs/MWh
Total Cost/MWh97.64


Offshore WindS
1MW @37% = 3241 MWh/yr
Capital+Fixed Costs/yr636134
Capital+Fixed Costs/MWh196.27
Variable Costs/MWh
Total Cost/MWh196.27


Standby Capacity

As we can see, even onshore wind is still more expensive than CCGT, but that is only half the story.

As wind power is inherently unreliable, every megawatt of wind capacity effectively needs to be backed up with something that is reliable
. For the sake of this exercise, let us assume this will be in the shape of new advanced CCGT.

So the real capital and fixed cost to provide that 1MW of onshore wind capacity is:


S
Onshore Wind222328
CCGT136419
Total Capital+Fixed/yr358747
@26% capacity = 2277 MWh/yr
Cost/MWh157.55


And offshore:

S
Offshore Wind636134
CCGT136419
Total Capital+Fixed/yr772553
@37% capacity = 3241 MWh/yr
Cost/MWh238.37


Compared with the CCGT cost per MWh of $80.45, claims that wind power is now the cheapest source of electricity are utterly ludicrous.



NOTES

1) The EIA notes that transmission costs are higher for wind power. While this is certainly also true in the UK, I have not included these in the analysis because the costs may be different.

2) We are obviously comparing on a new for new basis. Given that the UK already has a certain amount of existing capacity to back up wind, the comparative costs of CCGT would be even lower.

3) Running gas turbines on an intermittent basis is an inherently costly thing to do, and would add more costs to the wind options outlined above.

4) EIA assume a life of 30 years for all technologies. This may well be an overestimate for wind, and is almost certainly an underestimate for CCGT.

5) Capacity assumptions are from DECC:

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/energy-trends-section-6-renewables

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/electricity-section-5-energy-trends

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/10/18/the-real-cost-of-wind-power/#more-17695
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext