Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 165.13

+1.1%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: CDMQ who wrote (8971)	3/1/1998 10:12:00 PM
From: Dave	of 152472

CDMQ: RE: Irwin Jacobs stated that Qualcomm's patents were not "band specific. QCOM's Patents are not bandwidth specific, meaning that they do not claim a certain bandwidth, throughput, etc. I am still trying to figure out which 4 patents QCOM feels will protect them. Remember, Ericy, Mot, Nokia, etc. can still infringe on them and thumb their nose at QCOM. Then QCOM has to shell out alot of money suing them for infringement. Also, in the US, all patents are presumed to be valid, but...if you remember Intel... They sued Cyrix over the Crawford patent. Basically, Intel didn't enter into a cross licensing agreement with Cyrix, but Cyrix chips were being fabbed by IBM... Things could go differently in court.. dave

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next