Daniel Gold:
You might want to re-read this post closely.
Message 3247861
Interesting, too, how the earnings reporting service (Zacks) Jon Tara once used to wrongly and libelously accuse me of being a liar is now full of errors, according to Jon Tara. Notice he does not take the time to apologize to me for falsely and libelously accusing me of being a liar, on the basis of his superficial knowledge and obviously inadequate research.
Of course you won't now post to Jon Tara criticizing him for this uncivilized behavior. Nor will you complain to Jill about it. Did I ever falsey and libelously call someone a liar in public, discover the basis for that accusation was wrong, and then not apologize for that? Is this acceptable bahavior, in your view?
But, then again, Vanni bashing is too much fun, and let's not let the facts get in the way. Keep the lynch mob riled up against this guy who dared to criticize our ideas, to ask us to think (that is too much work!) and to criticize our favorite stock, Creaf (or fill in the blank of any other stock which I dared to apply critical thought to, thereby offending some of its shareholders/cheerleaders who post at SI).
SI is meant to be a place to discuss stocks and ideas. And that means the positive and the negative. It is not a cheerleading section where people gather to shout "Go Creaf! Go Creaf, Go!"
And, by the way. As long as we are on the subject of appropriate behavior. Don't you find it the least bit troubling when someone makes an overtly racist comment like: "Those analysts have to be wrong and stupid because they are in Singapore."
Or have you complained about that to Jill, too?
Happy Investing!
Yappity |
