Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (90418)	4/5/2003 7:54:09 PM
From: paul_philp	of 281500

It would be a supreme irony if the neocons, who loathe and detest the UN, concluded that they had to undertake a radical reform of the UN as their least bad option. As a psuedo-neocon of the Canadian strain, I don't see this as a bad thing at all. It will depend of the nature of the reforms. I think the neocons will be happy if the reforms allow American military power to be an effective deterrant in the world. I think many nations in the world might agree to that in order to make the use of American power be less ad hoc. Of couse, as the global cop, the US might want to the only veto. Interesting fact, for close allies: the USA, England, Spain and Japan account for 49% of the UN's budget. The other day someone said I am pro-American. While true, it is more accurate to say I am pro-Sherrif. Go Sheriff Go. Kick some bad guy butt. The most peaceful towns are the ones with the most effective sherrif. Paul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next