Naxos Resources (NAXOF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mark silvers who wrote (9055)	2/12/1998 4:56:00 PM
From: Ed Huang	Read Replies (1) of 20681

Mark, I was referring to the news releases on Dec 10, 97 and Jan 12, 98 for drill hole #5. The Dec 10 news release showed that Behre Dolbear only expressed their "opinion" that "the samples it collected have been reasonably secured against tampering..." That means it was only an ordinary opinion, if something bad happen, BD will not be responsible. On Jan 12, 98 news release, the hole #5 samples was under BD COC(as I understand they were the same samples as the ones on the Dec 10 news release). Apparently, there were some differences on the COC process between BD and Naxos in this case. SRK hole came in with much lower numbers but still meaningful. What we investors want are consistent and clear reports. I may have misunderstood something, so your comments are always welcome. Ed

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next