Impeach George W. Bush Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (9084)	1/2/2002 3:51:39 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) of 93284

The specter of malaria in England from global warming is a red herring, according to Christy. "Malaria is not a warm weather disease and was endemic in Britain in the 19th and early 20th centuries. It is constrained by simple public health measures. In countries wealthy enough to support a good public health infrastructure, there is little or no malaria, such as Singapore and northern Australia." It's particularly a red herring since the predictions that I've seen are that England will go sub-frigid with the disruption of the Gulf Stream. This is the first one I've seen that mentions malaria or warming within Britain. Russia’s Frigid Winter Russia is experiencing its coldest winter in 50 years, according to official measurements. The average temperature in Siberia was – 40 degrees C and fell as low as – 70 degrees C (Arizona Republic, February 18, 2001). This is significant because according to greenhouse theory places such as Siberia should see the largest rise in temperatures from increases in atmospheric concentrations in greenhouse gases. Because the coldest air masses on earth are also the driest, greenhouse gases exert a relatively larger influence on temperatures than in more humid regions, such as the tropics. Indeed, tropical temperatures should remain nearly steady. Hold on a sec....my understanding is that the world's climate varies on it's own [I think I read that somewhere]and picking a specific instance within a year wasn't proof that global warming existed. So how is it now, that these same people can now pick a specific instance and claim it disproves global warming. You're beginning to convince me that there is some very convenient biasing being inserted. jttmab jttmab

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next