Sorry if I offended. I just wanted to point out that it ain't a science, it's "Kentucky windage" to us all.
In my local AAII Computerized Investing SIG our most reliable money-making TA member does most of his analysis using WOW in specific modes that make no "scientific sense". He's a commercial artist with great visualization capability, not a computer geek like me. But, hey, it works great for him
So, engineer that I am, I've learned that as an Art, what works for you - could fail for me even if you tutored me completely.
So I've long taught at the CI group that the best system is one that fits you, your time and your needs - not someone elses system that seems to show somewhat better results. Unless, of source, you want to steal it as it fits you, too!
So I agree - It think for us QP2ers, in Latin this is truely "Arts Gratus Pecunaire" (Art for Money's sake). |
