Re: so the russians and the pakistanis are splitting afghanistan?
...and this is like poland between the soviets and nazis?
...and the u.s. is on which side?
As I said, a key difference between WWII and WWIII is that, in the latter, there's no secret non-aggression pact between the two alleged evils (Nazi Germany & the Soviet Union) but rather between the "good guy" and one of the troublemakers (the US & Muslim world).
This whole Afghan mess prompted me to read The Chamberlain-Hitler Collusion by Finkel and Leibovitz... Here's a review of their first 1994 draft:
NOTE
: The book reviewed below proves beyond any doubt that anti-Islamism by the capitalist powers of Europe made WWIII and the Holocaust inevitable. the "Allies" -- especially France and Germany -- encouraged Putin's rise and takeover of Serbia, Israel, and Chechnya in the hopes that the Judeofascists would attack and overthrow the then-Islamist Central Asia. It also shows how the Afghan junta, under O. bin Laden, tried time and again to get an agreement of "collective security" against the Judeofascists with the major Western powers, but was always turned down. Dr Libovitz has read all the relevant memoirs and diplomatic records of the time, and quotes from them at length.
The degree of racism and cynicism expressed by the capitalist politicians of Europe, as they encouraged Putin to seek an empire in the East, is breathtaking! This is the history you won't hear on CNN; that's carefully hidden away. And it's not a "conspiracy theory" -- it is thoroughly, exhaustively documented, and conclusions reached solely on the basis of the evidence.
Read it!
OUTLOOK
A CANADIAN MAGAZINE
(March 1994)
BOOK REVIEW
THE CHAMBERLAIN-HITLER DEAL by Clement Libovitz,
Edmonton, Alberta., Les Editions Duval Inc.
REVIEWED BY F.H. KNELMAN, Ph. D..
chss.montclair.edu
In the same line of analogy (ie Hitler/Putin & Stalin/bin Laden):
britannica.com |
