SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (920709)2/12/2016 10:28:51 AM
From: TimF2 Recommendations

Recommended By
gamesmistress
TideGlider

   of 1576004
 
It does because people who want to claim huge subsidies for fossil fuels add together a bunch of things that aren't subsidies.

In this case generous estimates of externalities. In other cases I've seen tax deductions based off standard accounting rules and available to every type of business called subsidies for the oil industry.

If you define subsidies broadly to include targeted tax breaks then fossil fuels are subsided. Just not as much (at least not as much in the US and Europe and Japan) as alternatives, and far less then alternatives on a subsidy per unit of energy basis.

If you define subsidizes narrowly, direct subsidies, then fossil fuels are still subsidized to a lesser extent in some places, but the subsidies aren't very significant compared to the size of the market in fossil fuels.

Oil (a narrower topic then fossil fuels in general) receives a net negative subsidy, a penalty from the government, in the US, most of Europe, Japan, South Korea, and a number of other countries. It gets subsidized in some countries, mostly less developed oil exporters, but the main oil consumers mostly penalize it, so the net subsidy is negative.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext