SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: milo_morai who wrote (92452)2/11/2000 9:59:00 AM
From: milo_morai  Read Replies (1) of 1575625
 
CPUmark 99 and FPU WinMark
Processor performance can be divided into floating point and integer unit speeds. Ziff Davis' CPUmark and FPU WinMark separate these two aspects of processing to compare the different architectures.



Integer scores for the Athlon 850 are significantly higher than both the Athlon 800 and Coppermine 800 CPU's. As the core frequency jumps in 50MHz intervals we should continue to expect this linear increase in performance.



Again, we see a linear trend with the floating-point unit of the Athlon. Where the Athlon 800 was able to beat the similarly clocked Coppermine 800, the Athlon 850 trounces it. Floating-point tests have consistently shown the Athlon victorious over the Coppermine, and FPU WinMark further drives this point home. sharkyextreme.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News