SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RockyBalboa who wrote (92889)10/17/2005 9:21:57 PM
From: StockDung   of 122087
 
SEC Spear Jackson frog Kirmit lol

============================================

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 52617 / October 17, 2005

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-12087

In the Matter of

KERMIT SILVA,

Respondent.:

:

:

ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(b) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING

REMEDIAL SANCTIONS

I.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in

the public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant

to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against Kermit Silva

(“Silva” or “Respondent”).

II.

In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Silva has submitted an Offer of

Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose

of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to

which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as

to the Commission's jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these proceedings, and the

findings contained in Section III.2 below, which are admitted, Silva consents to the entry of this

Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (“Order”), as set

forth below.

III.

On the basis of this Order and Silva's Offer, the Commission finds that:

1. Silva was the president of International Media Solutions LLC (“IMS”) of Orlando,

Florida, an entity not registered with the Commission in any capacity, from at least July 1998

2

through March 2004. Among other things, IMS solicited registered brokers to purchase or

recommend the purchase of stock in Megapro, Inc., and its successor, Spear & Jackson, Inc.,

both reporting companies, from at least February 2002 through September 2003.

2. On September 29, 2005, a final judgment was entered by consent against Silva,

permanently enjoining him from future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a)(2) and (3), and

17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), and Section 15(a)(1) of the Exchange Act,

in the civil action entitled Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kermit Silva, et al., Civil

Action Number 04-80354-CIV, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of

Florida.

3. The Commission's complaint alleged, among other things, that, in connection with the

solicitation of brokers to purchase Megapro and Spear & Jackson stock, IMS, with Silva’s

knowledge, failed to fully disclose the nature and amount of IMS’ compensation for promotion

of Spear & Jackson, made material misrepresentations and omissions about IMS, and employed

and compensated unregistered brokers.

IV.

In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest

to impose the sanctions specified in Respondent Silva's Offer.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

Pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act, that Respondent Silva be, and hereby

is, barred from association with any broker or dealer.

Any reapplication for association by Silva will be subject to the applicable laws and

regulations governing the reentry process, and reentry may be conditioned upon a number of

factors, including, but not limited to, the satisfaction of any or all of the following: (a) any

disgorgement ordered against Silva, whether or not the Commission has fully or partially waived

payment of such disgorgement; (b) any arbitration award related to the conduct that served as the

basis for the Commission order; (c) any self-regulatory organization arbitration award to a

customer, whether or not related to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission

order; and (d) any restitution order by a self-regulatory organization, whether or not related to the

conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order.

By the Commission.

Jonathan G. Katz

Secretary
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext