<b>A tribute to "Neocon" Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : A tribute to "Neocon"

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (92)	11/22/2010 1:17:28 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) of 110

<<So according to that logic the wife of a professor in astro-physics should be running NASA because she has experience in such things as stellar dynamics and evolution; galaxy formation; magnetohydrodynamics; large-scale structure of matter in the Universe; origin of cosmic rays; general relativity and physical cosmology, including string cosmology and astroparticle physics.>> Not the same thing. Can't compqre physics to politics. I was in politics for about 30 years. My ex is married to a man who was Majority leader of our legislature. She was his adviser on a constant basis. And they had and went to parties constantly where politics was discussed constantly. My older daughter is married to a physics professor at a university in the northwest. They do not talk physics. When Hillary was still in college she worked on Goldwaters campaigna and worked for the congress as I recall. So she has been in politics her whole life. Hillary has much, much more political experience than rice and is twice as smart. And last, no self respecting person would have helped bush get into that bullshit war in Iraq.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next