SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Alphabet Inc. (Google)
GOOGL 325.87+1.2%11:29 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hardly B. Solipsist who wrote (929)2/11/2005 11:23:28 AM
From: GVTucker  Read Replies (1) of 15857
 
On the hiring issue, Google management agrees with your perspective.

This is from an article in yesterday's WSJ:

At the company's first analyst meeting since its August initial public offering, the executives said they are aggressively adding products and staff, but are limited by their own recruitment standards and ability to expand Google's technical infrastructure. The Web-search company, which this month reported fourth-quarter earnings that roughly doubled from a year earlier, is known for a rigorous hiring process, which can include tests of the candidate and more than a half-dozen interviews.

"Can we hire the quality and quantity of people we want to? No," said co-founder Sergey Brin, speaking before several hundred analysts at Google's Mountain View, Calif., headquarters. "We're underinvesting in our business because of the limitations of hiring." Google said it has more than 3,000 employees, up from 2,292 in June.

Mr. Brin said Google was "probably 10% to 20% below" where it wanted to be in terms of the level of its technical infrastructure. Google has deployed thousands of computers in data centers around the world, assembled from low-cost parts and linked together by sophisticated software it has written.


Here's the full link for any of you that have a subscription:

online.wsj.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext