SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc.
SLJB 0.000001000-90.0%Jun 4 9:43 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim Bishop who wrote (937)12/1/2006 6:26:18 AM
From: rrufff   of 1681
 
See her posts here - She stated that he deposited it. That was her decision. It was deposited in her account. All standard.

The issue is confusing but I think it comes down to whether or not the drawer of the check or Petar changed the check to certified. Even that is not clear if you read her posts.

So - good case?

From what we have here, the most we seem to have is an unjust enrichment equitable type action if Petar retained the asset somehow.

If there was fraud or collusion, it has not been detailed from what has been written so far.

I'm not defending the company or Petar (re their screw-ups) but to accuse someone on NO coherent evidence is just not right.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News