SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
REFR 1.568+0.5%Dec 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (9439)3/14/2003 10:09:16 AM
From: N. Dixon  Read Replies (1) of 10293
 
1) You're stating that the licensees aggregate (meaning, all of 'em; consolidated) have actual sales (not merely sales projections) that exceed $1B (US dollars), and that (by inference) 100% of these $1B in sales (or reasonably thereabouts) employ SPD technologies to which REFR is entitled to 5% to 10% royalty payments; and

No. Bill was questioning why I'd invest in a company with REFR's market cap and revenues and I correctly pointed out that I'm investing in the SPD industry, which includes companies who are currently active in producing and selling SPD products.

2) REFR solely owns the 5% to 10% (as measured in US dollars via the royalty payments) of the SPD technology (via patents, copyrights, or legal contracts), and that REFR owes nothing of that same 5% to 10% in royalties to some/any competitor, or that no competitor owns any of the specific SPD technology which the licensees intend to use in the product(s) comprising their aggregate $1B in sales...

True. REFR gets 5-10% of the net sale price even if the product contains other technologies or wiring. It's from the entire product.

Most every major car manufacturer has an SPD project in the works with one of our licensees. We now have marine products and our windows are being sold by several companies. These markets are huge and sales will grow exponentially.

ND
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext