2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 387.40

+0.5%

Dec 9 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (94526)	9/13/2012 12:49:02 AM
From: Maurice Winn	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 218306

Perhaps, but it seems to have proven its point with the usual Islamic Jihad foaming at the mouth murderous response: < It's really difficult to understand why it's caused such a furor. Any sane person would have ignored it after viewing it for 10 seconds.> [Not that I have seen it, so I am guessing at its point] Are you saying the Islamic response is not sane? Speaking of responses. When the USA was attacked at Pearl Harbour by the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere [run from Tokyo], it ended with 2 atomic bombs which persuaded Nippon Jihad to revise their ideology. Islamic Jihad has declared war on Israel and Jews [and everyone else in general] with Iran a primary proponent of bulk Jewish genocide. Iran is not developing atomic bombs to keep Afghanistan at bay, nor to deal with Turkey or Russia, or any of the Stans. They intend to remove Israel and all the people that will require from the face of Earth. Given the difficulty of long range bombing runs to stop Iran from developing their atomic bombs, it might make sense to do as the USA did and get Iran to change their ideology via unconditional surrender and constitutional change of their governing arrangements and ideology. Japan seems to have done well from the change. Perhaps Iranians could do with such a change. There were swarms of Iranians revolting in the streets in recent years, obviously unhappy about their bosses. Israel certainly won't want to wait for President Amendiejihad to get his atomic bombs and methods of delivery. Appeasement didn't work in 1939 and it won't work now. President Obama objects to Libyan attack on the USA embassy and murder of American diplomats. Well, maybe he should do some more appeasing to see if that works. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next