Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 174.80

+0.3%

Dec 5 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: gdichaz who wrote (94560)	2/24/2001 8:07:16 PM
From: The Verve	Read Replies (1) of 152472

Chaz, I agree with you 100%. Both Ben Garrett and Eric L are great. Those guys share their knowledge so selflessly... (BTW - let me tell you a little secret. I enjoy your posts too and love it when you ask those guys questions and engage them in discussion. You're so good at it. There are times when I'm too busy to read every post so I head right to where I know where the intelligent commentary exists - you're always in the middle of it.) Anyway, I think one can make strong cases for each scenario, ie: a relatively timely '02 -'03 WCDMA debut, or a relatively late one '04, '05. I'm of the impression that those GSM operators are holding out for wcdma...they're in a bunker with their decision. It's gonna take some serious selling to pull an operator or two from their bunker and surrender to the CDMA 2000 side. If that happens, then who knows where we'll wind up. Mark Roberts seems to think that nobody is firmly committed to wcdma YET, even with all the posturing, agreements, etc. We'll see. BTW, where's Eric L lately? I see he's over on the NOK board - is he snubbing his American Q compatriots for the company of guys who speak with accents? Verve

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next