SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
REFR 1.540-1.3%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Wexler who wrote (9461)3/16/2003 4:49:35 PM
From: N. Dixon   of 10293
 
Re: An open letter to Bill Wexler
by: aarrcc 03/16/03 03:55 pm
Msg: 135006 of 135010

<<If Wexler did not sound credible, you wouldn't post your dumb letter to him everyday.>>

If Wexler answered my questions - or even made a serious attempt at it - I wouldn't post my dumb letter.

<< I think the trouble you have with Wexler is that even his most outlandish accusations wouldn't surprise many if they turn out to be true -- they sound like they could be true.>>

LOL. What can I say? You and I have wildly different ideas about plausibility. You acknowledge that Bill's claims are outlandish and without evidence - yet they might be true because they fit some fantasy of yours. Can *you* explain why he refuses to provide evidence for his claims?

Certainly I am willing to contemplate any factual statement that has evidence to back it. The idea that "Bill Wexler" is this guy's real name seems wildly implausible every time that "Bill" makes a new, conflicting statement about it.

But I do want to encourage him to keep talking - and if I'm repetitive, I have to apologize. He can end the repetition by providing the requested evidence - or by providing some plausible reason why he won't provide the requested evidence.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext