Glazeddonut, I have no idea if I have captured all of your ignorant posts on the subject, but let me address these. My comments in bold.
Message 30227722
UBR has shown in its SEDARS a disposition over a period of time of its shares.
Correct. But how does that have any bearing on Canada Carbon? Canada Carbon's duty is to report on the disposition of its Asbury Project. They have no control over, nor any knowledge of, the acts of an arm's length public corporation. It was the public disclosure by UBR on SEDAR that informed CCB that the shares had been sold.
Message 30227748
Chief if this situation was reversed where ZEN was the company giving consent but apparently not releasing it to market.Nucleau Bob and hoov would never let it die.NEVER
Bob and I are both informed of legal obligations. If UBR violated the terms of the transaction, how does that reflect on CCB? Without reading a complete copy of the property purchase agreement, in fact, you have no idea which conditions subsequent may have affected the agreement, notwithstanding the stated requirement for written consent. Two lines in a press release can hardly be expected to disclose all of the terms of the agreement. In my experience, similar agreements can run from 15 pages to 100, or more.
Message 30230669
Shares were being sold late 2013 early 2014.
Yes, that's what SEDAR records indicate. The warning to shareholders was provided in the original press release, however. 5 million shares were issued to an arm's length third party. Canada Carbon has no knowledge of transactions by its shareholders, unless they are disclosed by that third party.
Message 30230730
Its almost like URB was told to vote all its shares as mgt of CCB dictated for two years.Ogilvie heaved or outed? Does not matter once the voting done I guess shares were indispensable.
It's clear you have no understanding of corporate governance. You have made that perfectly clear.
Lar |
