SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 45.51+10.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joseph Pareti who wrote (95630)1/11/2000 10:16:00 AM
From: Tony Viola   of 186894
 
Joe, i find it difficult too. why would Intel want to bin down better chips ?

To grab orders for them and not let them get away to the competition. The issue, or at least one of them, as I've been reading it, is between 500 and 450 MHz. Someone pointed out that there's a very small difference between the selling prices of these two, they're so close in frequency. BTW, the only difference between 450 and 500 is the marking. They are the same design, same chip, same process, and I'm sure practically all chips that are good DC and function-wise pass 500 as well as 450. This is a very mature process we're talking about. So, it's not as though Intel is selling a more expensive to make part at a lower price.

Tony
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext