Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (96099)	1/21/2005 12:05:55 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (3) of 793925

<"If, in fact, the Israelis became convinced the Iranians had a significant nuclear capability, given the fact that Iran has a stated policy that their objective is the destruction of Israel, the Israelis might well decide to act first, and let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up the diplomatic mess afterwards."> If Iran's objective is via a violent attack, then that's a declaration of war and Israel might as well go on the attack any time now. It would be better of course for Israel to support a revamped UN to take control of the situation and prevent Iran's threat being enacted by diplomatic or military action. But in the dog eat dog world we seem to be stuck in, they might as well cut to the chase and deal with the problem now. That's assuming that Cheney's comment is true. The little boy crying wolf in Iraq was wrong previously, so why should we believe his "intelligence", snigger, now? Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next