Rock Resources Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Rock Resources

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mike Gold who wrote (963)	3/16/1999 12:02:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) of 1996

Thats why it was proposed as my "guess". I will stick with my guess and make the appropriate acknowledgements if wrong. Until then its my guess. As I have mentioned, the gold, if there, may make this a Gold/copper prophry which makes the copper.....the credits! If the value of the Gold + copper raises the value of a tonne to the equivalent 1% then I am still not wrong. It is a guess based on $$$ per tonne...which as you have stated may be understated because of the IPs restriction in depth or size of the anomaly. The relevance of either .63 or .7% is limited at this pont because the discussion does not allow for any gold as stated earlier. If we were to state .63 as likely then we would begin speculating the size of a "yet undiscovered" gold deposit which when already using a "yet undiscovered" copper deposit pushes the envelope IMHO. So....dats my guess....whats yours! A pleasure.... Mike, thanks for the input! the Chief

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next