SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (96761)1/25/2005 6:02:08 PM
From: neolib   of 793782
 
On the other hand, linking genetic variation to racial groups may also contribute to what anthropologist Alan Goodman has noted as a "comeback" in "racialized notions of biology." n20 Given our nation's long and troubled history of mistreatment and oppression of racial groups based on (mis)understandings of biological difference - not least in the area of medical research n21 - such a "comeback" should give us pause

That nicely sums it up. If we learn that something "meaningful" actually is racially linked, we should pause and consider whether this is acceptable. Because if it is, lots of people will clamor to become jerks again. Duh, pick up a 2x4 and wack the jerks on the head! Metaphorically! Don't deny the science!

But, 45% of Americans deny a very wide swath of science anyway because it conflicts with their religious beliefs. So I'm barking up the wrong tree I guess.

Well, I've added my 2'cents worth to this, so later..

PS How long did lawyers argue that tobacco did not cause cancer? This will give one some indication of how long they may argue that there can't possibly be any significant racially linked difference between humans. Meanwhile a bunch of biotech companies who are not blinkered will haul a bunch of cash to the bank. God bless America!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext