Mainstream Politics and Economics Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Little Joe who wrote (9982)	2/21/2012 10:22:34 PM
From: koan	of 85487

<<But the the fact that there is one list of over 1,000.00 scientists who are skeptical about some aspect of Climate Change, as put forth by the alarmists.. http://www.climatedepot.com/a/9035/SPECIAL-REPORT-More-Than-1000-International-Scientists-Dissent-Over-ManMade-Global-Warming-Claims--Challenge-UN-IPCC--Gore lj Are those all PHD atmospheric scientists who research AGW? If not, it is like having psychologists judge Einsteins theory of Relativity. The subject of AGW is not unlike the theory of relativity in its complexity. The number of people who fully understood relativity numbered in the dozens for decades. But they were right. Relativity and quantum theory have withstood every test over the century, which means Einstein was right. The best PHD atmospheric scientists in the world are pretty much unanimous in their beleif in dangerous AGW. Do the 1,000 you mention have the knowledge to challenge the best and the brightest atmospheric chemists? Little Joe, this is not a game, but serious stuff and our kids lives depend on it. That people call these great scientist's claims alarmist, is pornographic, not to mention plain dumb.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next