SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (998890)2/5/2017 2:53:48 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) of 1575240
 
>> What he fails to mention is that the new NOAA results have been validated by independent data from satellites, buoys and Argo floats and that many other independent groups, including Berkeley Earth and the UK’s Met Office Hadley Centre, get effectively the same results.

Yeah, except no.

NOAA results were DETERMINED by "adjusting" the readings believed CORRECT to agree with those thought to be wrong. This is the most bizarre thing I'd ever heard of and it is the reason I have been bitching about it ever since. You just do not do that.

But you can't just call it all a lie. The person making this claim to the Daily Mail is the guy who designed the review procedures. You don't ignore this person, particularly when a hundred billion dollars of taxpayer money is on the line. Plus more graft by the climate change takers.

This man says those data will have to be adjusted. The so-called "deniers" have been pointing these lies out since they occurred. And now, you want to blame it on the newspaper who REPORTS it?

Pathetic. It is pathetic.

There is no point in discussing this material with you because it is clear that under no circumstances will you admit to the fraud. Even when it is in-your-face.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext