Thor, eventho I understand near zero market and business and mining stuff,
I feel that there is a level playing field here on these highly speculative
stocks in companies like this that are in the promise phase and not yet in the
making money phase.
To me, because of this, Zeev's technical issue regarding volume vs. share price
and who bought and sold issues may show direct cause and effect, but to me its
an illusion in that the real reasons for these results are determined by not logic
and facts, but by a circle of non related events chasing each other in a circle.
Yes, Zeev and others with honest and good records and methods can be documented,
but if one travels the circles and twists and turns, then one can see that there is not a start and end point, but lots of feedback that at times
supplies the means for a continuation, when reasons for such, never happened.
The above is a very good example, and case if needed proof, of BABBLE.
The really good type of posts for gpgi shareholders is the one by Harry Roberts
that was just posted. Replace talk of past mistakes and mis-steps by a means
to create new events to lead to a money making gpgi.
To: Dennis DeNoble (9994 )
From: Harry Roberts Tuesday, Apr 6 1999 6:03PM ET
Dennis:
What does Mike mean <the company believes this may be the right time to
tell the market of the company's potential> or some such line?
Here's my take on things: Everything posted in the past few days is true
-- the market will only believe funds received. Mike's latest post
didn't make any commitments to future dates of actual milestone events
or even the date of the next release. The past two days trading shows me
there's still far more GPGI holders looking to get out than there's
fresh blood coming in. To get that fresh blood requires more than a PR
Newswire release every 2 or 3 weeks.
You've got a real job as IR Director, Dennis. Now it's time to do it.
You should talk to Dick and announce your PR strategy for the coming
months -- current investors need to know you'll be doing something
significant to introduce new people to the company. Please post or
release a statement on this ASAP.
In the meantime, the market could also be pleasantly surprised if the
company did something positive but unrelated to Sabin results. For
instance, is it time for a real CFO? One who by his very reputation will
bring attention to the company? Or is it time to announce specific steps
and by when the company intends to handle the OTC BB crackdown? Or file
this year's annual financials? Or let a major take a minority stake, if
only again to make GPGI more legitimate?
Any of these non-mining issues could give confidence to the market, and
there's no reason why you guys need to be stingy with the releases.
Check out stocks that are flying -- you'll often see them announcing
news, even really minor stuff, every other day or so.
You guys have got enough going on now, at HQ as well as in the desert,
to make regular announcements about how you intend to legitimize this
company legally, financially, and via a high stock price. Tell us about
management's direction and intent -- tell us about how you are bringing
in new blood. Make us feel like this company is healthy and not about to
go to an all-time low.
There are hundreds of cases of companies with excellent products who
went under because of crappy marketing and publicity. Don't let GPGI be
one of them. You don't have to overpromise -- just let us know you're
all working towards a multitude of important goals.
I've been with you 12 years, but even my patience has limits.
Harry |
